Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without ...
by dtech on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @09:54AM
(#16473791)
Rush hour traffic is usually the heaviest in a single direction, the empty self-driving cars would mostly be going into the other direction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without ...
by Piskvorrr on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @10:05AM
(#16473899)
...if there's ten of them. If there's 1000 of them, now the rush hour traffic is both ways. That is the expected scenario, not "I have my very special car like nobody else has."
Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without ...
by adrianmonk on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @04:22AM
(#16481789)
The self-driving cars are not in a hurry to get to their parking space. The commuters don't want to be late for a meeting, but the self-driving cars don't care about being late for a parking space.
Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without ...
by Piskvorrr on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @06:49AM
(#16482333)
Yes, and...? Doesn't change the fact that they're creating congestion (not only for themselves but also for other road users); plus the return trip can be expected to be "pick me up at $location at $time", which is again a scheduling problem.
Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without ...
by xattt on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @09:58AM
(#16473828)
Clearly, the solution is to let self-driving cars drive into town on the opposite side of the road.
Re:California to allow testing of self-driving cars without ...
by delecti on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @10:10AM
(#16473967)
Rush hour traffic in that single direction might get heavier if the drivers of single occupant cars can do other things with their time. It simultaneously removes some of the disincentive of a long commute, and also removes much of the benefit of not being the driver.