Re:Why can’t women get pregnant without the menstrual cycle?...
by jcl on Monday February 26, 2018 @10:40AM
(#16466014)
Perhaps it was this article -- where analysis of age-50+ members of a particular Amish community showed that lifespan of mothers increases linearly up to 14 children, and increases with later age at last birth:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16510865
(Interesting... it also shows a positive -- but lower/noisier -- effect for fathers as well, so there may be more at work than just stem cells.)
Re:Why can’t women get pregnant without the menstrual cycle?...
by toasterlovin on Monday February 26, 2018 @12:25PM
(#16467020)
Just a friendly reminder that correlation != causation. Personally, I would bet that what's happening here is that healthier individuals choose to have more children, rather than that having more children increases life span.
Re:Why can’t women get pregnant without the menstrual cycle?...
by BurningFrog on Monday February 26, 2018 @10:33PM
(#16470884)
Almost.
An evolutionary theory based guess is that healthy long lived individuals are more attractive in the mating arena and therefore have more children.
Re:Why can’t women get pregnant without the menstrual cycle?...
by toasterlovin on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @10:19AM
(#16474063)
I think the Amish get married young and then stay married for life, so not sure if attractiveness plays a factor (since more or less everybody gets a mate).
Re:Why can’t women get pregnant without the menstrual cycle?...
by ajuc on Monday February 26, 2018 @09:06AM
(#16465287)
> women that had like two or three kids, live longer on average than those that didn't
Can't have 3 kids if you died at age of 10.
If the mother's body leaves fetal cells alone, they have can act as essentially free stem cells, helping repairs.
I forget the exact journal, but women that had like two or three kids, live longer on average than those that didn't.