News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AMP: the missing controversy. Parent comment

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by mulmen on Saturday February 24, 2018 @05:19PM (#16455777)
The best way to improve AMP is to drag it out behind the wood shed and shoot it. People just need to get better at making mobile web pages.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by paulddraper on Saturday February 24, 2018 @05:22PM (#16455793)
I'm not saying you're wrong.

But I will say I think your wood shed idea won't work.

(Though I am very open to hearing more about it's implementation.)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by mulmen on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:03PM (#16456005)
Yeah I don't think that's realistic either but validating Google by participating in their selfish initiative isn't going to do anyone any favors.

Where you can oppose the adoption of AMP and work on improving the rest of the ecosystem so that AMP has fewer compelling applications.

[ Parent | on HN ]