Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by psyc on Saturday February 24, 2018 @04:02PM
(#16455380)
This hasn’t happened to me yet, but now it has a place in my thoughts, whereas 10 years ago I had no inkling of the possibility whatsoever.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by mcguire on Saturday February 24, 2018 @05:54PM
(#16455952)
That would be an actionable question, no?
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by throwaway65536 on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:41PM
(#16456172)
I would rather spend time succeeding on my own merits.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by hycaria on Saturday February 24, 2018 @04:19PM
(#16455469)
Well considering y combinator is not empty every year, there must be people who have a chance with that level of scrutiny.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by eli_gottlieb on Saturday February 24, 2018 @04:31PM
(#16455535)
And we have a word for those people: milquetoast. I'm not sure people would hire me after asking about my politics for 20 minutes. What, you're gonna employ someone after getting an earful about Marx and Bookchin?
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by bittercynic on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:28PM
(#16456119)
Is it possible the political questions are really a test to see if you have the good sense to avoid bringing controversial politics to work? Maybe they were looking for something along the lines of "Political opinions will differ. I'm more interested in being part of a productive team than having my politics validated."
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by themarkn on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:44PM
(#16456188)
People are so complicated that most "tests" like this, to see how somebody responds, strike me as useless. You are not in a controlled environment, and pretending you are is foolish. You might get a reaction and presume to know the cause, but it's hard to be sure. Maybe somebody reacts badly to a strong signal that the interviewer doesn't know how to be appropriate and professoonal in an interview.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by bittercynic on Saturday February 24, 2018 @07:07PM
(#16456284)
Strongly agree with your statement, but I still think it is understandable for interviewers to want to know how their interviewee will react in situations that can easily lead to big conflicts. If you reflexively act in a way that escalates in stressful situations, that's useful information in a hiring decision.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by psyc on Saturday February 24, 2018 @08:55PM
(#16456677)
I hope people can understand the difference between getting a feel for someone's temperament, vs. getting a feel for their political opinions. I highly doubt that the situation in question was the former and not the latter.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by bittercynic on Saturday February 24, 2018 @09:21PM
(#16456763)
Crucial difference. Only meant to suggest that there is some possibility that the question was probing at temperament. Asking about politics might be used as a method of checking how easy it is to anger someone, since it is a topic that causes many to control of their emotions.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by psyc on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:57PM
(#16456230)
It doesn't really matter. It's very inappropriate. What you're describing is sometimes called a "shit test". A disingenuous request intended to draw out a response to be judged. This has no place in an interview.
Re:Why 3.5M Americans in their prime years aren’t working
by eli_gottlieb on Saturday February 24, 2018 @09:58PM
(#16456877)
I have the good sense to avoid working with people who are playing mind games with me.
I have been openly asked about my politics at an interview for a Y Combinator startup (Starsky Robotics). "We need to make sure you are not a horrible person." One of my references later told me that the co-founder was on the phone almost 20 minutes asking probing questions about me. No offer, no feedback. Who stands a chance with that level of scrutiny?