News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014). Parent comment

Re:Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014) by Thaxll on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @11:45AM (#16430761)
For once there is no consensus how to do parallelism an concurrency in Rust since none of the library are matures.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014) by kibwen on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @04:07PM (#16432982)
> none of the library are matures.

Rayon, the Rust library getting most of the discussion in this thread, is now 1.0: https://github.com/rayon-rs/rayon/blob/master/RELEASES.md .

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014) by coldtea on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @12:14PM (#16431007)
Don't most people opt for something called Tokyo? I don't do Rust much, but even I have heard of it by now...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014) by steveklabnik on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @12:25PM (#16431108)
Tokio for IO concurrency, Rayon for data parallelism.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014) by Bitcoin_McPonzi on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @01:17PM (#16431576)
Exactly! Rust doesn't solve any parallelism problems. It's no better than established languages like C# or F#, and probably worse.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why has CPU frequency ceased to grow? (2014) by vvanders on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @04:02PM (#16432953)
I'd consider handling data races gracefully a pretty large step forward in doing parallel data computation.
[ Parent | on HN ]