News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by smallnamespace on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @12:13AM (#16427020)
> Do people really consider the ethics of introducing tech like this?

But consider the fact that you are using terms out of the humanities, while most of my fellow CS students endlessly griped about how useless their humanities courses were and how they wished the school would get rid of that course requirement (six courses total over 4 years).

Until we teach the tech-priests of the 21st century the great responsibility due to the power that they hold, I doubt things will improve.

Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by Nursie on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @02:52AM (#16427715)
I'm not sure I agree the implicit assumption here that humanities courses necessarily result in more, well, humanity.

In the UK, for instance, we have no requirements for a university degree other than the courses relevant to that degree. I was there to study computer science, not get a rounded education at someone else's insistence.

And yet most of the really rapacious, conscienceless, anti-human stuff seems to me to come from the libertarian and 'bro' fringes of Silicon Valley, seemingly despite the requirements to study more 'humanities'.

Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by stordoff on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @04:05AM (#16428015)
> In the UK, for instance, we have no requirements for a university degree other than the courses relevant to that degree.

Which depends almost entirely on the university in question. My computer science degree (Cambridge) had two separate courses focusing on ethics/humanities. Year 1 had Professional Practice and Ethics (which starts as broad as "Ethical theory. Basic questions in ethics. Survey of ethical theories: [...]. Advantages and disadvantages of the two main theories: utilitarian and deontological.", not just as it relates to CS), and Year 2 had Economics and Law (broad introduction to micro/macroeconomics, and a general overview of the law as it related to CS). The course introduction for the latter notes that you are to treat it as if reading a humanties subject:

> One word of warning: many part 1b students may never have studied a humanties subject since GCSE. It is a different task from learning a programming language; it is not sufficient to acquire proficiency at a small core of manipulative techniques, and figure out the rest when needed. Breadth matters. You should spend at least half of the study time you allocate to this subject on general reading. There are many introductory texts on economics and on law; your college library is probably a good place to start.

FWIW, I don't recall many complaints about the presence of these courses. Most seemed to find it useful to get a more rounded view, and it was a nice change of pace from tens of hours of pure computer science a week). It was also likely helpful for my later studies in Law.

https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/0809/EconLaw/

Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by nabeards on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @08:50AM (#16429395)
> Which depends almost entirely on the university in question.

This is also true in the US. I actually chose to study religion and philosophy in addition to CS. My reasons for doing so aside, I truly benefited from it as it helps guide the type of work I will take. I'm torn on whether it should be required, mainly because I am not in a position to decide what makes a 'better' software engineer.

Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by stordoff on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @08:34PM (#16434501)
I didn't doubt that; I just felt that the OP made it sound like doing a UK CS degree would mean only studying pure CS, which is overstating things somewhat so wanted to clarify. You aren't necessarily going to be picking classes from across the university to fulfill generic requirements (if nothing else, you don't really have the time to do so), but it's not hyperfocused either.
Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by Nursie on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @06:39PM (#16433958)
I would certainly consider courses in professional practice, law and ethics to be far more supportive and on topic than generalised requirements to take a certain number of "humanities" courses.
Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by JoeMalt on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @11:58AM (#16430861)
Unfortunately the Econ, Law and Ethics course is still widely derided, even though some of the content is genuinely useful.
Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by binaryriviera on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @03:49AM (#16427964)
I agree. It seems to come from the silicon valley culture more than anything. After all Peter Thiel, one of the more extreme examples of this sort of thinking, got a philosophy bachelors degree iirc.
Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by briandear on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @04:14AM (#16428050)
Libertarians aren’t “anti-human,” they are anti-totalitarianism.
Re:Face-verify.js: Monitoring who is physically looking at a... by Nursie on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @06:41PM (#16433969)
The ethics and actions that spring from libertarian thought certainly appear to be suited more to perfectly rational robots than to imperfect, fleshy and irrational humans, and how people actually live their lives.