Re:Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Computer Vision
by dEnigma on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @04:22AM
(#16418937)
People who still smoke nowadays aren't even deterred by the very graphic images of internal organs affected by smoking-related diseases that are printed on cigarette packs in many countries (next to very clear wording that smoking will harm you and people around you). So I doubt that this would make much of a difference in that regard.
Re:Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Computer Vision
by moreless on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @05:13AM
(#16419163)
Probably not. They already know the outcomes and don't seem to care.
However 71% seems like a very low number... Does that mean that in 7 out of 10 cases the system guesses correctly if the patient is smoker or not? That's not really impressive IMHO. What am I missing?
Re:Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Computer Vision
by VMG on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @06:03AM
(#16419398)
what is impressive is that humans cannot do it
Re:Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Computer Vision
by TeMPOraL on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @06:39AM
(#16419606)
They can get to 50% with a coin.
Re:Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Computer Vision
by nicklaf on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @03:29AM
(#16418709)
I seriously doubt that, just reflecting on how smokers so often remain unswayed¹ even by far more brutal prognostications about the habit's effect on their longevity.
¹well, unswayed about actually quitting now
Re:Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Computer Vision
by mxschumacher on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @03:57AM
(#16418831)
certainly interesting info for health insurance firms
Wonder if smoking would decrease if people could see the change over time