Re:React Native and Yoga Both Given MIT Licence by Facebook
by zitterbewegung on Friday February 16, 2018 @11:06PM
(#16398931)
If that were true then why are they changing the licence at all?
They have tooling and are well positioned but what they need is big players to also back them so that people are more incentive to buy in. That is where moving the licence to MIT makes sense.
Re:React Native and Yoga Both Given MIT Licence by Facebook
by pbalau on Saturday February 17, 2018 @05:33AM
(#16400066)
To buy in for what? If literally everybody apart Facebook stops using React, the project will still go on because it powers a shitload of FB properties.
Re:React Native and Yoga Both Given MIT Licence by Facebook
by SOLAR_FIELDS on Saturday February 17, 2018 @05:39AM
(#16400090)
But then they wouldn't get the free labor of the community.
Re:React Native and Yoga Both Given MIT Licence by Facebook
by zapita on Friday February 16, 2018 @11:22PM
(#16398982)
I think we are saying the same thing. Which part of what I said do you disagree with?
Re:React Native and Yoga Both Given MIT Licence by Facebook
by irrational on Saturday February 17, 2018 @01:22AM
(#16399358)
>But is there a viable alternative with the same level of features and ecosystem momentum?
Does it matter? At some point something else will come along and React will go the way of jQuery. And then something else will come along and supplant whatever supplanted React.
But is there a viable alternative with the same level of features and ecosystem momentum?
GraphQL and React Native, in particular, seem well positioned to dominate their respective niches. That gives React a big advantage, which might counteract the licensing issues, no?