Downvoted for asking what is the evidence?

What data do you propose as a convincing argument and how do you expect someone on hacker news to have a silver bullet? If this data were easily available and accessible in a transparent way, there wouldn’t need to be a long ongoing national agency level investigation.

What is the best we have?

That didn’t answer my question at all.

Let me be more concrete. It appears you have the very background you are requesting. What approach or approaches would you take to convince others?

My answer would be: there is no credible or valid evidence. Hence I asked. Muller cited these specific posts as examples: http://archive.is/5sEEo

Ok. So you asked what can be argued (from your own point of view) to be a rhetorical question. I’m glad we could get to the bottom of why you got downvoted.