News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on U.S. Charges 13 Russians, 3 Companies for Interfering with Election. Parent comment

Re:U.S. Charges 13 Russians, 3 Companies for Interfering wit... by codezero on Friday February 16, 2018 @04:42PM (#16396672)
What data do you propose as a convincing argument and how do you expect someone on hacker news to have a silver bullet? If this data were easily available and accessible in a transparent way, there wouldn’t need to be a long ongoing national agency level investigation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Charges 13 Russians, 3 Companies for Interfering wit... by puppetmaster40 on Friday February 16, 2018 @05:08PM (#16396920)
What is the best we have?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Charges 13 Russians, 3 Companies for Interfering wit... by codezero on Friday February 16, 2018 @05:55PM (#16397303)
That didn’t answer my question at all.

Let me be more concrete. It appears you have the very background you are requesting. What approach or approaches would you take to convince others?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Charges 13 Russians, 3 Companies for Interfering wit... by puppetmaster40 on Friday February 16, 2018 @07:43PM (#16398049)
My answer would be: there is no credible or valid evidence. Hence I asked. Muller cited these specific posts as examples: http://archive.is/5sEEo
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:U.S. Charges 13 Russians, 3 Companies for Interfering wit... by codezero on Saturday February 17, 2018 @11:18PM (#16404430)
Ok. So you asked what can be argued (from your own point of view) to be a rhetorical question. I’m glad we could get to the bottom of why you got downvoted.
[ Parent | on HN ]