News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble by FLUX-YOU on Friday February 16, 2018 @10:57AM (#16393206)
>I put my selections back and walked out the door. Granted it was near peak shopping season - but that was inexcusable.

Scaling retail is hard. Especially if you're against "be on call 24/7 for minimum wage without additional on call compensation".

They could buy self-checkout terminals, though, but I imagine they don't want assets like that and would rather let the business fail. That's the writing on the wall (if not the stock trend)

Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble by phxrsg on Friday February 16, 2018 @12:05PM (#16393762)
Scaling retail is hard to get perfect to the same precision of auto-scaling AWS, maybe, but scaling to an acceptable (measured in profit and customer satisfaction) level really isn't. Or rather, the solution is known.

Especially in December - during prime holiday shopping hours - you staff up. It's more profitable to have a little bit of employee slack time than to have customer satisfaction way down and customers walking out without buying things.

This is a bad take - the whole "oh retail will die without self-checkout terminals" overlooks the realities of retail, what consumers want when they choose to go into an actual brick and mortar store, and how businesses can succeed. And it does so in a way that perpetuates the implication that we have to treat employees like computers to be successful.

Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble by FLUX-YOU on Friday February 16, 2018 @12:46PM (#16394130)
>It's more profitable to have a little bit of employee slack time than to have customer satisfaction way down and customers walking out without buying things.

For big box stores, but B&N are on the decline, while real estate and lease prices have likely risen.

"you staff up" works when you can actually pay for the excess, but B&N clearly don't want to. But you missed the point of my take in that they aren't willing to invest in assets for customer satisfaction. They're on the way out, so why would they care to staff up for holidays either?

Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble by wfo on Friday February 16, 2018 @11:18AM (#16393378)
Or, alternately, the company could do what every other company in existence does and what B&N has always done and have people work during what they know will be the busiest time of the year instead of sending everyone home, destroying the company and letting the CEO pocket the savings.