Re:MongoDB gets support for multi-document ACID transactions
by SamReidHughes on Thursday February 15, 2018 @09:52PM
(#16389513)
I didn't do comparisons. But RethinkDB has straightforward issues like a slow QL implementation using a lot of CPU and a lot of disk space usage. Change feeds have a few scaling issues if you want a lot of them. I don't know that it has mysterious kinds of excessive resource usage. I'm a dev of RethinkDB, not an end user, so I might be seeing the worst side of it. I haven't used Cockroach or TiDB.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.