Re:MongoDB gets support for multi-document ACID transactions
by fastest963 on Thursday February 15, 2018 @05:59PM
(#16388545)
We are in the process of evaluating CockroachDB vs Rethink internally and we've found CockroachDB to perform very poorly without obvious disk or CPU issues. I'm curious if you've seen different especially as it relates to Rethink.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:MongoDB gets support for multi-document ACID transactions
by SamReidHughes on Thursday February 15, 2018 @09:52PM
(#16389513)
I didn't do comparisons. But RethinkDB has straightforward issues like a slow QL implementation using a lot of CPU and a lot of disk space usage. Change feeds have a few scaling issues if you want a lot of them. I don't know that it has mysterious kinds of excessive resource usage. I'm a dev of RethinkDB, not an end user, so I might be seeing the worst side of it. I haven't used Cockroach or TiDB.