Re:JavaScript Promises Discussion: Make Them Monadic? (2013)
by sushid on Thursday February 15, 2018 @07:15PM
(#16388939)
I started programming professionally around the same time but I'm surprised that you think Promise.all([]) makes things easy. IMO Promise.all([]) is nice until you start supporting proper error handling.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:JavaScript Promises Discussion: Make Them Monadic? (2013)
by nawgszy on Friday February 16, 2018 @02:31PM
(#16395219)
I'm not sure what you're getting at, can you expand?
I work a lot with databases, so say you're trying to write an object and its children in some sort of one-to-many relationship to the DB.
You can write a Promise chain like
startTransaction()
.then(() => writeParent())
.then((children) =>
Promise.all(children.map((child) =>
writeChild(child)
))
)
.then(
// handle success
endTransaction(),
// handle error
cancelTransaction()
)
What exactly about that isn't "proper error handling"? Can you expand a bit on how this would be handled differently by you, or perhaps what paradigm you're programming in where Promise.all executes a bunch of items that can't all have the same success and error handler?