Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by mijamo on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @02:45AM
(#16365429)
Many channels can be more efficient than digital. When I did advertising for after sale services for cars, the most efficient channels were physical mail, then radio, then specialized magazines, and then digital. Main reason was demographics and lack of focus in digital (very hard to convey a message that is not super basic).
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by 8bitsrule on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @01:30AM
(#16373918)
" If your goal is to promote a brand"
As a shopper, I know damned well that brands mean nothing these days. Here's my deal: Make a great product, promote it enough so that I know it exists, is something I really need and will last, and - after I test that with experience - I'll promote your brand for free.
The deal is off once you're bought by some Org only interested in milking the brand dry.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by bonestamp2 on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @12:34AM
(#16364983)
Yes. Coupons are a popular way to gauge in store action, but they have a very low redemption rate and they're far more expensive than digital.
If a company is finding digital advertising to be inefficient then they should cut it, but it begs the question - what IS efficient for them? In my experience, the efficiency of digital simply can’t be touched.