Re:Insider trading has been rife on Wall Street, academics c...
by pedrocr on Sunday February 11, 2018 @04:41PM
(#16354980)
In aggregate the market is zero sum so if you think 1 or 5 hedge funds would beat the average easily who are the suckers taking the other side of those bets?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Insider trading has been rife on Wall Street, academics c...
by andr3w321 on Sunday February 11, 2018 @06:38PM
(#16355467)
The stock market is not zero sum. The people taking the other side of well managed hedge funds are usually poorly managed pension funds/hedge funds, index fund ETFs that blindly buy a bunch of stocks without looking over their financial statements, or dumb public retail investor money.
Re:Insider trading has been rife on Wall Street, academics c...
by pedrocr on Monday February 12, 2018 @04:52AM
(#16357643)
>The stock market is not zero sum
All securities are held by someone and the total return of the market is the total return of all those securities. For someone to outperform the market he has to hold a mix of securities that outperforms and whoever holds the opposite mix underperforms. Sock market returns are very much zero sum.
>the other side of well managed hedge funds are usually poorly managed pension funds/hedge funds
How do you pick ones from the others?
>index fund ETFs that blindly buy a bunch of stocks without looking over their financial statements
That's the point of those ETFs, replicate the index exactly. If they're replicating the market average then they're doing exactly their jobs.
Re:Insider trading has been rife on Wall Street, academics c...
by mancerayder on Friday February 16, 2018 @09:47AM
(#16392647)
Why would you expect someone to hold the opposite mix of securities that you hold? That's a curious approach you're taking.