Re:IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
by ac29 on Saturday February 10, 2018 @08:26AM
(#16347201)
>I noticed sometimes these posts get downvoted
If you wonder why people are downvoting you, its because at least this post reads like you are promoting some random cryptocurrency here and you haven't even bothered to say whether you have a vested interest in it succeeding (because you hold coins or otherwise).
Re:IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
by koonsolo on Saturday February 10, 2018 @02:50PM
(#16349188)
Yes, I also own those coins.
I guess if someone is interested incrypto and talks positive about a certain coin, there is a 99.99% chance they own it.
I never saw this requirement with companies though. "My macbook is great because of x and y". Let's downvote him because he probably owns Apple stocks without telling.
Well, I have this feeling with Nano. Intstant, free and scalable transactions. The first 2 are definitely there. The last one looks promising, and some load tests for that are scheduled.
That the entire network should be able to handle 7000 tps with the power of a single windmill is also cool.
To me, this is potentially the internet money that was promised with bitcoin.
I noticed sometimes these posts get downvoted, so here is an interview with the main developer. Decide for yourself: https://youtu.be/hAy4GDV7tvQ