Is developer compensation becoming bimodal?

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by fnord123 on Friday February 09, 2018 @01:16PM (#16342505)

> Compare to mechanical engineering, where if you use the wrong steel your bridge will fall down; or to medicine, where if you prescribe the wrong drug someone might just die.

Dereference the wrong pointer and the rocket blows up. Forget a memory barrier and the robot brain gets corrupted memory and sees human life as an impediment to paper clip maximization. Forget to zero out some memory in a goto: cleanup section and suddenly there's a back door in a popular security library leaving machines to the whim of any curious script kiddie.

I know a lot of people aren't working on real time systems or encryption libraries that have the same level of significant consequences as what you're describing, but some are.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by empthought on Friday February 09, 2018 @02:38PM (#16343205)

For software developers (and in fact, for the general public), the smart play is to rely on real engineers to provide mechanical, electric, or electronic failsafes in their designs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by mcguire on Friday February 09, 2018 @04:56PM (#16344187)

That seems to have worked well for Intel.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by jpindar on Friday February 09, 2018 @06:29PM (#16344740)

Nowadays the electronics has code in it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is developer compensation becoming bimodal? by woolvalley on Friday February 09, 2018 @03:05PM (#16343413)

And most mechanical engineers are not necessarily making bridges, they are making adhoc small objects.

[ Parent | on HN ]