Re:Rent Control Needs Retirement, Not a Comeback
by sitkack on Friday February 09, 2018 @11:08AM
(#16341270)
Talking about books that you haven't read. [1]
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/jan/06/fiction.societ...
Signaling that you haven't read it gives one a defensible position! You can't criticize my mischaracterization of the arguments of the book, I haven't read it! Her opinions can be her alternative facts known to none except her.
There is accidental fallacious logic, and then there is manufacturing bullshit.
Re:Rent Control Needs Retirement, Not a Comeback
by hindsightbias on Friday February 09, 2018 @11:24AM
(#16341450)
There were bloggers whose raison d'être was debunking her. IDK if they've moved to twitter or not:
https://inversesquare.wordpress.com/tag/mcardle/
The lesson is, glibertarians always fail up.
I'm afraid you're right and Miss McArdle is really nothing much more than a libertarian hack.
Case in point: Her book review fo Piketty's "Capital in the Twenty-First Century". While opinions may certainly differ about the tome this is a bit rich for a book review:
Reviews a book she hasn't read and needless to say completely trashes it in the process.I actually agree: Bloomberg really should have her fired.
I link to the Baffler article[1] since the original review is apparently only available to subscribers.
[1] https://thebaffler.com/latest/what-pikettys-conservative-cri...