News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by nradov on Friday February 09, 2018 @08:53AM (#16340132)
And I want to use those same headphones with airplane seat back entertainment systems. Those will probably never support Bluetooth.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by robin_reala on Friday February 09, 2018 @09:02AM (#16340190)
They’re going away in general as airlines look to save weight and slim seatbacks, and recognise that the vast majority of people have a portable entertainment device with them.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by nataz on Friday February 09, 2018 @09:13AM (#16340263)
That may have been a brief trend on domestic flights with older airframes, but that isn't the general aviation trend. The last thing you want is more lithium batteries charging and discharging on a long flight over the ocean.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by Frondo on Friday February 09, 2018 @10:52AM (#16341069)
A few months ago I flew across the pacific. I'd say half the passengers watched something on their own devices.

That ship, of fewer devices, has sailed.

Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by ryanwaggoner on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:39PM (#16342165)
This doesn’t make much sense. If there’s an explosive risk, then it’s going to be a huge risk over land as well, and it doesn’t make sense that they’d be increasingly putting outlets at every seat.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by dingaling on Saturday February 10, 2018 @04:50AM (#16346634)
>If there’s an explosive risk, then it’s going to be a huge risk over land as well

However overland flights ( generally ) don't route up to 240 minutes flying time from the nearest diversion airfield.

Four hours is a long, long time with a cabin fire.

Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by lumisota on Friday February 09, 2018 @10:49AM (#16341038)
How does this fit with the trend of carriers adding WiFi?
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by mi100hael on Friday February 09, 2018 @11:54AM (#16341744)
The WiFi on planes is satellite and something like 256 Kbps with extreme latency. It works fine for light web browsing and email, but it's unusable for video streaming. Your options are to pre-load entertainment or watch what the plane has pre-loaded in the seat-back entertainment screens.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by ryanwaggoner on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:43PM (#16342195)
This is changing. Gogo has new technology that’s supposed to be up to 100 mb/s, though I’m sure real-world will be lower.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by nightski on Friday February 09, 2018 @10:53AM (#16341083)
I hope not. I fly Delta specifically because I can watch new release movies and other entertainment on board. It's amazing for those cross country flights. I hate flying United which has no such option.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by lotsofpulp on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:48PM (#16342237)
I love flying United (or Jetblue or Alaska), they usually have access to Amazon Prime movies for free. And they tend to have plug outlets and chargers at all the seats.
Re:Samsung’s Galaxy S9 looks set to retain the headphone jack by nightski on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @02:03PM (#16369759)
Ah, it must just be the route I am on then. That is unfortunate. They don't even have screens.