Re:Musk explains why SpaceX prefers clusters of small engines
by bluedino on Thursday February 08, 2018 @12:22PM
(#16333756)
Depends on the task - it turns out rocket thrust is quite parallelizeable
Re:Musk explains why SpaceX prefers clusters of small engines
by perlgeek on Thursday February 08, 2018 @04:02PM
(#16335572)
> I suppose there is always a physical limit on the total capacity of low latency addressable ram and storage you can manage to shove into an architecture.
Some people even argue that, due to these physical limits, storage access time tends to scale O(sqrt(N)) with the size N of the storage, including for RAM.
http://www.ilikebigbits.com/blog/2014/4/21/the-myth-of-ram-p...
I always figured, in theory, a super-super-powerful single threaded single processor would out compete the multi-threaded multi processor design on efficiency, because of the hardware and software inefficiencies in inter processor hardware connections and communication. In practice, I suppose there is always a physical limit on the total capacity of low latency addressable ram and storage you can manage to shove into an architecture.