It's exactly as unlikely, but possible, to do the same and get the exact sequence: 6 2 2 4 5 4 4 1 4 4 4 3 5 4 2 4 6 2 4 4 1 1 2 4 4 4 6 6 4 6 6 1 1 2 4 4 1 5 1 2 3 6 3 3 3 1 6 4 1 4 1 5 4 2 2 5 6 2 1 6 3 5 3 3 2 6 6 6 3 6 5 5 1 5 4 6 2 6 4 3 2 2 5 1 5 3 3 5 4 5 6 4 1 5 5 6 6 6 6 3
(generated via https://www.random.org/integers/?num=100&min=1&max=6&col=5&b...)
http://lcn2.github.io/mersenne-english-name/m19937/prime-c.h...
Expect to get length 1 in a number 10 digits long, 2 in a number 100 digits long (10²), 3 in a number 1000 digits long (10^1000)... So expect to find a run of 100 6s in a random number 10^googol digits long I think.
> 10 digits long[...]100 digits long[...]1000 digits long[...]10^googol digits long I think.
Not 10^googol digits. Googol digits long. Except you don't even need that much, because die rolling is base 6.
It's unlikely, but possible, to roll a 6-sided die 100 times in a row and get 100 6's.
In basically every PRNG algorithm, there is _no_ reachable state which will result in 100 6's in a row.