And if their odds really are slim, wouldn’t the rational choice for Columbus to make be to offer tax breaks?
Like, why is the actor that is Columbus concerned at all if they put some sort of pressure on Boston/NYC/DC?
(I think HQ2 will be Columbus or Denver).
The prevailing claim that Amazon has already chosen and is trying to extract better incentives seems wrong to me. If that was the case Amazon could have approached ~5 cities from the start with a plan for each and put a far stronger competitive pressure on them.
I think what this is really about is getting the cities to do the leg work of the research and initial planning process. Amazon wasn't going to put together 200 initial site proposals and 20 more detailed ones. By letting the cities make the proposals Amazon can look at far more potential sites than if they had done the research internally.
For what it's worth, I live in Indy and I get emails from Amazon every week trying to get me to work somewhere fairly close to here (like Detroit).
University of Illinois has top notch CS grads too, pretty close to Indy. Seems like the most likely reason they made the list.
Indy also has underrated infrastructure - having to host the massive event that is the Indy 500 every year has given the city experience in dealing with large influxes of travelers.
LoL
People who think Amazon is going to set up shop in NYC or LA or something are delusional.
NFL teams only play 8 home games a year, and they're usually very big - 60k-100k seats - much too large for almost any other event. These massive buildings might only be used 10 or 12 times in a year. Huge waste of taxpayer money.
Do i want my city to give Amazon a huge incentive package? Probably not, I think we're moving in a good direction already. Would I be upset if they promised significant public transit improvements as a lure to Amazon? Not at all; long overdue civic improvements that likely will never get approved else-wise.
This has to be balanced against the cost to the municipality over the years the company would have been there. The tax breaks and incentives may generate revenue, but as the story notes, the fully burdened cost to the government may wipe out any additional tax revenue. It is proper to ask "what additional costs did taxpayers bear that they wouldn't have if the company had not located there?"