Re:Why Did a Billionaire Give $75M to a Philosophy Department?
by meri_dian on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @10:45AM
(#16274708)
It sounds to me like you're philosophizing about code then, which is a fine thing to philosophize about.
We use natural language to express abstractions formed over a very complex world, so it's guaranteed that when talking we'll be imprecise in some way, but the goal is to try to reduce this imprecision.
Re:Why Did a Billionaire Give $75M to a Philosophy Department?
by tommorris on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @01:42PM
(#16276321)
> If a philosopher isn't available, a lawyer would probably be qualified as well.
The lawyers are busy explaining to the "smart contracts" people that trying to translate contract law into code is going to produce a whole lot more comedy than it is practical value.
A philosopher should explain to all the natural-language-as-code people why their endeavor is much, much harder than they think it is. If a philosopher isn't available, a lawyer would probably be qualified as well.
Point being, I feel like I'm getting some of those benefits just writing code and talking about it on a regular basis.