News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kodak’s Dubious Blockchain Gamble by matt_s on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @07:59AM (#16273467)
Wouldn't an approach not emphasizing the corporate lawyer be better? Something where say a media company can just pluck whatever images it wants out of a repository and the software will infer a blockchain hash out of the image or metadata and then bill them accordingly for usage. Make it completely simple to setup and run so pirating of images is actually harder to do.

A media company just needs to run the software on their systems and manage a subscription on usage. Probably some typical SaaS subscription models would work.

And the SaaS then gets the photographers paid. This doesn't need blockchain at all for the currency aspect, just to ensure proof of owner on the images. There are probably other ways to do that though.

Re:Kodak’s Dubious Blockchain Gamble by jethro_tell on Wednesday January 31, 2018 @12:19PM (#16275476)
Well photogs don't need protection from paying customers and there are already ways to sell your photos. Where they really get screwed is when someone who's not paying uses the photo, then the 'corporate layer' sends a cease and desist or possibly a DMCA take down depending on the situation.

What you're talking about is keeping honest people honest, so proof of work is just waste, a central DB and a billing system is fine for that.