Of course tax subsidies are useful to bootstrap on a $ cost basis, but with current costs and rate of falling costs even that will soon become unnecessary (let's get rid of fossil fuel subsidies to make this "real world data" comparison fair though).
No, it's the other way around: fossil fuels are subsidized by governments to the tune of $4.8 trillion a year, so solar needs to be subsidized as well to be able to compete.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=42940.0
They don't even build Walmarts without tax subsidies these days.
Are externalities (CO2 output) taken into considerations in your unsourced REAL WORLD DATA!!~!
Right, so on that basis these bids below the grid rate indicate that they now work?
Bidders are very frequently unable to actually deliver. See pretty much any highway project ever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_photovoltaic_power_sta...
(note how the biggest ones are all new)