Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by tree_of_item on Sunday January 28, 2018 @03:57PM
(#16253430)
No it isn't. You should default to disbelieving such extraordinary claims.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by colordrops on Sunday January 28, 2018 @10:17PM
(#16255096)
Who is the arbiter of whether something is "extraordinary"? You? Perhaps you should do some cursory investigation on published research before being so quick to judgement.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by tree_of_item on Monday January 29, 2018 @08:52AM
(#16257456)
To be clear, we're talking about binaural beats. There's no such published research showing any kind of results. I haven't been "quick to judgement", binaural beats have been on the level of homeopathy for over 20 years now.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by tw1010 on Sunday January 28, 2018 @04:09PM
(#16253505)
You should default to having no strong opinion at all.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by chc on Sunday January 28, 2018 @04:15PM
(#16253554)
Skepticism due to insufficient evidence and lack of obvious plausibility isn't usually considered a strong opinion.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by colordrops on Sunday January 28, 2018 @10:18PM
(#16255098)
There is evidence though.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by chc on Sunday January 28, 2018 @10:39PM
(#16255174)
Whether or not there is evidence of this particular thing is irrelevant, because this subthread is about whether skepticism is just as irrational as blind belief when confronted with unsupported claims.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by dwaltrip on Sunday January 28, 2018 @06:07PM
(#16254148)
Better still, default to having a strong opinion only with good reason, and the capacity to quickly give it up when presented with a more compelling view.
And then of course... we shouldn't expect to be able to sum up highly effective heuristics for understanding the world in a single sentence.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by tree_of_item on Sunday January 28, 2018 @04:10PM
(#16253518)
Turmeric added to coffee adds twenty years to your lifespan.
Are you completely ambivalent to such a ridiculous claim? No, you should disbelieve it unless you get a sufficient amount of evidence.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by taeric on Sunday January 28, 2018 @05:35PM
(#16253997)
To be fair, science thrives on curiosity. I'd prefer we establish something was safe and have at the experiments.
So, disbelieve in part by trying to disprove. Win win.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by varjag on Sunday January 28, 2018 @06:07PM
(#16254147)
Science is not being advanced by disproving crackpots. It's a waste of precious resource better spent elsewhere.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by colordrops on Sunday January 28, 2018 @10:18PM
(#16255104)
What's your definition of a crackpot? Someone who researches something varjag has a negative emotion towards?
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by varjag on Monday January 29, 2018 @03:22AM
(#16256149)
Someone who maintains something is true while lacking any evidence of that. There's an infinity of possible untrue statements, but only finite amount of research resource. Disproving every crackpot theory doesn't advance actual science one tiny bit.
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by taeric on Sunday January 28, 2018 @06:36PM
(#16254278)
You'd be surprised. :)
Re:Evidence that the brain’s ability to control thinking rel...
by varjag on Monday January 29, 2018 @03:23AM
(#16256152)
Don't think I would.