Please don't post unsubstantive comments here, and especially not trollish ones like this.

Trollish?

Not my comment, but I have to ask:

What does "it was probably a homeless person and the homeless have it bad enough" imply to you, if not allowing them someone else's belongings/money out of a sense of need?

Except nothing was stolen. So it just redistributed my time and Geico's money to the car dealership

The conspiracy theory is that the auto glass shops "employ" the homeless to go around and break windows. One thing I found is that you just leave your doors unlocked. Don't have anything in the car at all. I know it sounds crazy and isn't applicable in every case but I'd bet it would reduce window breakages.