Re:Some obscure C features
by WalterBright on Thursday January 25, 2018 @08:30PM
(#16236360)
> Most important was that it was the language of Unix
More important was it was the only language that really worked on DOS, which ruled the computer biz for 10 years. I would guess 80% of programming was done for DOS, and C was a very good fit for the 640K systems.
On my corner of the planet we were using Turbo Pascal, Turbo Basic, Quick Basic, Clipper, FoxPro, DBase.
C and C++ had no special place on the spectrum of programming languages usage, unless we were porting code between MS-DOS and UNIX.
Until it was time to move into Windows, and anyone not using C or C++ started to be left behind, manually writing FFI wrappers (e.g. Turbo Pascal/Delphi) and we eventually migrated to one of them.
None of that is true at all. Turbo Pascal was hugely popular on DOS in the 1980s into the early 1990s. It wasn't until Windows 3.1 that Turbo Pascal really started losing market share to C. You are also completely forgetting about Apple. IBM PC compatibles did not even pass 50% market share until 1986.
Well, sure, but Microsoft wouldn't have chosen to promote C if not for the success of Unix. :)
There are equally important reasons why C's usage has been in steady decline from the '90s to today.