Re:People leave managers, not companies
by collyw on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @05:57AM
(#16221803)
OK, I'll give an example. My team leader in a previous job used to regularly turn up at 11am (officially we were supposed to be in by 9.30, but it was academia and no one complained too much). I was usually in before 9.15 - like the majority of the staff.
So sometimes I would need to ask him something, and he wasn't around - that would hold me up. Sometimes other people would need to ask him something. He wasn't around, so they asked me instead - usually when I was trying to get in the zone.
I am all for giving staff flexibility but it should not come at an expense to productivity.
Re:People leave managers, not companies
by cpfohl on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @06:19AM
(#16221870)
Remote, timezone-distributed teams deal with this all the time. We always ensure everyone has a bunch of work they can do, and we use email/chat to handle the asynchronous communication issue. What you described isn't a scheduling issue, it's a communication issue. Not on your part, either, BTW.
Re:People leave managers, not companies
by TheCoelacanth on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @11:58AM
(#16224189)
A team that can't function on their own for two hours sounds like a very poorly run team.
What is on time? On time for what exactly?
Is he missing any meetings? Is he working fewer hours? Is he doing less work? Is he impacting a colleague?
Why do you consider something that has no relationship to the posters job to be a basic requirement to being a professional?