Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by stavrianos on Friday August 20, 2010 @09:38PM
(#1622060)
I know a fact about "zygote machines": they are the only machines we know of that have ever successfully constructed intelligence algorithms.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by Qz on Friday August 20, 2010 @10:00PM
(#1622087)
A few centuries ago, europeans had only ever seen white swans.
Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by stavrianos on Saturday August 21, 2010 @01:12AM
(#1622308)
even with the obligatory "so far" tacked on the end, I think that's pretty significant
Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by Qz on Saturday August 21, 2010 @08:19AM
(#1622694)
We can't know if it's significant at all based only on the fact that we haven't seen it yet. It seemed pretty significant that Europeans had only seen white swans, to the point where the concept of 'black swans' was a jest, like "when pigs fly!". Then they got to Australia and found black swans. The black swans had been there before English was even a language.
The simple fact of not having seen something is totally baseless as evidence to whether or not that something is possible.
Re:Ray Kurzweil Responds to "Ray Kurzweil does not understan...
by stavrianos on Thursday August 26, 2010 @12:12AM
(#1635043)
Absence of evidence is evidence of absence. No-one has ever observed electric blue swans. How likely do you think it is that they exist? If this seems like an unfair question, that's kind of my point.