News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitLab 10.4 released by sytse on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @10:59AM (#16214541)
I stand by the claim we have 2/3 market share in the self-hosted git market. The claim is now linked to a page that contains the details https://about.gitlab.com/is-it-any-good/
Re:GitLab 10.4 released by dominotw on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @11:47AM (#16214939)
buddybuild and bitrise are not representative of * all * self-hosted git market. Your claim is totally absurd.

See responses to your similar comment here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15704055

Also discounting jenkins as "not modern"( whatever that means) and declaring yourself as number one is so dishonest. You "standing by it" means nothing.

Why is so important to you push these lies, I don't get it.

Re:GitLab 10.4 released by sytse on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @01:52PM (#16216220)
buddybuild and bitrise data probably has a bias in it. But we didn't find much else to go on. If you of anyone else knows of something we should use instead please let me know.

I think that since the blue ocean update to Jenkins they have added lot of the next generation features. I'll either specify the claim better or lange it later today.

Re:GitLab 10.4 released by dominotw on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @02:09PM (#16216433)
> But we didn't find much else to go on.

Don't make claims based on unreliable data. I am not sure how else to express this.

see similar comments here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15704407

Re:GitLab 10.4 released by sytse on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @12:58AM (#16220669)
No data is perfect, we consider the data reliable.

As promised I changed the wording of our CI/CD claims https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/commit/64ce89fd...

Re:GitLab 10.4 released by dominotw on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @09:12AM (#16222754)
> buddybuild and bitrise data probably has a bias in it.

> we consider the data reliable.

I give up!

Re:GitLab 10.4 released by user15672 on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @01:32PM (#16215999)
Bitrise seem to deal with a niche market (mobile development), so claiming their study shows a general trend in the self hosted git market is a stretch at best. I'd imagine boring old git itself and non-website backed things like gitosis are still a massive part of the overall install base. In any case, the claim that gitlab's on 2/3 market share just screams disingenuous marketing fluff to me and cheapens gitlab as a whole.
Re:GitLab 10.4 released by sytse on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @01:01AM (#16220680)
According to Google Trends https://www.dropbox.com/s/ldyvpxa0vbvelie/Screenshot%202018-... Gitosis reached 4% of GitLab's popularity in 2011 and is now at 0%.

If course Google Trends is not equal to installed base. But based on our experience I also don't think gitosis still has a massive installed base.

Re:GitLab 10.4 released by user15672 on Wednesday January 24, 2018 @05:25AM (#16221672)
You are correct, Google trends is pretty much irrelevant here. You would be surprised by Gitosis (and many others you've dismissed). It's pretty much in every company I've worked in over the last 7 years. It's never well liked, but it works just fine. Most companies don't need bells and whistles that come with GUI based git installs, so they don't waste the money switching away to them.