Re:One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC ...
by undersuit on Monday January 22, 2018 @06:04PM
(#16208970)
I think you're being too harsh. Right now silicon use is of course wrapped up in a loop of value derived from the coins being mined having value, but that completely disregards the actual value of the blockchains. An excellent quote I found is: "how to recycle what will soon or later be a HUGE obsolete distributed supercomputer dedicated to SHA-256."
Re:One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC ...
by asudghionbio on Monday January 22, 2018 @06:33PM
(#16209211)
>that completely disregards the actual value of the blockchains
It doesn't. I just think the value of blockchains is near zero. I have yet to hear of any problem that isn't better solved with a normal database.
Re:One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC ...
by imtringued on Monday January 22, 2018 @07:21PM
(#16209582)
There is one problem that the blockchain solves.
It can make a large hostile network with extremely high computation resources act like a single computer with the performance of a 10 year old desktop.
Re:One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC ...
by Andaith on Monday January 22, 2018 @05:13PM
(#16208488)
What about something like folding@home?
Re:One Bitcoin miner is buying 20,000 16nm wafers from TSMC ...
by asudghionbio on Monday January 22, 2018 @06:30PM
(#16209189)
No floating point whatsoever. That's the "application-specific" part of "application-specific integrated circuit."
It has no social value and never will.