News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is Rust difficult? by always_good on Monday January 22, 2018 @07:11AM (#16203785)
On the other hand we ripped out channels and went back to mutexes. And my experienced Go-developer friends seem to have all the same reluctance to use channels after ending up in channel hell.

There are good aspects of Go concurrency like how the whole ecosystem is async by default (like Node's), but truly praising the model is something I mainly hear from beginners.

Re:Why is Rust difficult? by stubish on Tuesday January 23, 2018 @01:44AM (#16211537)
This is something I noticed with Go. Channels are great and all and occupy a decent chunk of the tutorials and whatnot, but they see to be rarely used apart from a fairly cumbersome way of handling timeouts and cancellation. It seems if you stick concurrency in your libraries you end up in knots, and its left up to the code that uses the libraries to wire up all the synchronous & blocking bits.
Re:Why is Rust difficult? by FullyFunctional on Monday January 22, 2018 @08:19PM (#16209987)
I don't know Go, but could you point to more details on the "channel hell"? I would have assumed it was a good way to structure parallelism so I would like to see why not.