News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Network Latencies and Speed of Light by bpchaps on Saturday January 20, 2018 @08:15PM (#16196359)
Serious question: for a transatlantic network, would it ever make sense to do something along the lines of buoy + helium balloons + laser or microwave? Or in a similar vain, would it make sense to attach microwave 'towers' to shipping vessels?

I could see something like that work really well for the HFT world, where some clever hacks could make use of an unstable, but extremely low latency connections.

Re:Network Latencies and Speed of Light by Jedd on Sunday January 21, 2018 @01:06AM (#16197065)
It depends what problem you're trying to solve.

For inter-landmass traffic, my gut feel is bandwidth is the bigger concern.

The latencies we see now (as noted in TFA) are not that far from theoretical limits. I'd suggest responsiveness is best solved further up the stack -- and it's what most organisations have done / are doing.

Basically you don't want to run chatty protocols over high RTT networks, and people are slowing getting this ... but many orgs are stuck with HTTP, MAPI/MoH, SMB/CIFS consuming most of their WAN bandwidth.

Re:Network Latencies and Speed of Light by newman8r on Saturday January 20, 2018 @11:37PM (#16196881)
the current longest microwave links are only a few hundred kilometers apart if I recall correctly (http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/exalt-sets-new-worl...)

so you'd be talking about MANY links to achieve a transatlantic connection. Optical links would have to be even closer.

Re:Network Latencies and Speed of Light by itcmcgrath on Saturday January 20, 2018 @11:12PM (#16196813)
I doubt that would be lower latency. Even forgetting the physics and curvature issues, you'll end up with many more hops which is going slow it down due to processing and retransmission delays.
Re:Network Latencies and Speed of Light by wmf on Saturday January 20, 2018 @11:49PM (#16196906)
Microwave is faster even though it requires more hops.