News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by tjoff on Friday January 19, 2018 @04:43AM (#16185108)
Last decade I'm not so sure. I bought the very first readily available consumer quad core CPU a decade ago (the Q6600), two years ago I upgraded and I had to pay a huge premium because I wanted more than four (I got six!) cores. And that is just starting to change today.

Not that core count is everything but consumer desktop CPUs have stagnated quite a bit. Here's to hoping AMD stirs it up a bit.

Re:Is it time for open processors? by cm2187 on Friday January 19, 2018 @05:40AM (#16185306)
Because the compute power for consumer CPU nowadays is good enough, the effort has been in reducing energy consumption. But if you look at the server / workstation side, you can get 20+ cores in a single dice.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by tjoff on Friday January 19, 2018 @06:40AM (#16185492)
Good enough relative to the competition perhaps.

Nowadays the CPU is the bottle-neck even when surfing the web and using simple (electron) text editors.

Re:Is it time for open processors? by mpweiher on Friday January 19, 2018 @11:47AM (#16187604)
But that's not really a CPU problem but a software problem. And faster CPUs won't fix it, due to Wirth's Law.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by pjmlp on Saturday January 20, 2018 @04:41AM (#16192769)
Anything built with Electron is the anathema of simple.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by imtringued on Saturday January 20, 2018 @05:19AM (#16192849)
If you consider core count desktop CPUs have had massive increases in performance in the last year and will get another massive increase when 7nm arrives.
Re:Is it time for open processors? by tjoff on Sunday January 21, 2018 @10:06AM (#16198294)
This seems to only reinforce my point?