But, I think it would be crazy for an american, anglophone company to place a second HQ here. It would dramatically cut the talent pool.
Also, apologies for the triple comment on this thread. It seems each edit of my top comment added a comment.
Housing crisis.
But I'm curious, have they actually publicly stated that they want a lot of geographical distance between the old and new HQ? It's an assumption that informs a lot of what's being said here.
I understand that rent is rising in your area. That is awful.
But you do realize that Portland's rent is comparable to the rent in many other US metros? In fact, it's cheaper than quite a few! With better infrastructure and poverty rates!
I'm from Chicago, and the rent in Portland is pretty comparable. You can find cheap rent in Chicago if you don't mind commuting 45-60 minutes each way and living in an (almost) literal war-zone. When was the last time you witnessed a drive by? Or had an active gang-shooter outside your house having a gun-fight with other bangers?
I understand that rent is rising in your area. That is awful.
Did you intend to post this as a reply to someone else? Someone from Portland?
Having HQ2 far away from Seattle reduces business risk from e.g. major earthquakes.
I expect Montreal would be completely ruled out because of the language laws, incidentally. Fine for a branch office, unacceptable for a second HQ.
So, I'm not sure you're right about Toronto being a token candidate. I believe it's the best candidate in Canada.
But, moving to Canada is a big choice. So big you'd really want to consider only the top 1-2 candidates.
I do wonder what kept Vancouver off the list though.