Re:The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently
by beat on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @04:41PM
(#16162952)
There's also some history to it. Saxophone is a relatively new invention, dating only to the mid-19th century, well after what people think of as "classical" was mostly done. By the time classical music could adapt, it had already moved in other directions. Saxophone was adopted readily by marching bands because it's portable and loud.
Historically, "jazz" started in the 1890s in New Orleans, when black performers were first allowed to play music in public. They played what was available to them - marching band instruments. Saxophones, brass, bass drums and snare drums. String bass and piano were added as the music moved indoors. Banjo dominated the string section until the electric guitar was invented, as guitars aren't loud enough to compete with all the horns and drums.
Re:The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently
by cma on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @04:45PM
(#16162985)
Unvarying unvarying belltone or sine wave sound would be more appropriate for something focused only on melody and not on tone, which is the opposite of OP's point. Sax tone has a lot of variability and control.
Re:The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently
by beat on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @05:04PM
(#16163159)
The melodic advantages of the saxophone are mechanical, not tonal. For example, to play a scale fragment on saxophone, one need only move fingers, while continuing to blow, creating a smooth, legato sound that can be done very fast. Contrast with guitar, where a note must be fretted and then picked, two separate motions that are difficult to coordinate. Smooth legato playing at high speed is extremely hard. Trumpets have a similar problem, tonguing notes to make changes.
And yes, saxophones have a great deal of tonal expressiveness available, especially once overblowing is brought into play. It's just not pretty tonal expressiveness, compared to other instruments.
Re:The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently
by cma on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @10:09PM
(#16165152)
You can still do legato on guitar:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTI2s4svE2s&t=1m24s
Re:The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently
by beat on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @02:18PM
(#16170838)
Meh. Legato on guitar comes at a cost of expressiveness and note choice. When hammer-on and pull-off are your only ways to sound a note, you lose all the coloration available from dynamics, palm muting, distance from bridge, pick angle, and the million other little things guitarists do to make a note special. And note choice? Scales of any substance will force either difficult position shifts, or legato-breaking string switches.
It can be done, and I certainly do it. But it can't be all that's done, or your sound falls flat.
Re:The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently
by UncleMeat on Tuesday January 16, 2018 @06:05PM
(#16163684)
But it fits poorly into an orchestra. Your tone needs to mesh nicely. There is a reason why the well known classical sax pieces tend to use it as a solo voice (e.g., Pictures at an Exhibition).
[1] https://youtu.be/cKBrnjxlKgU?t=34
[2] https://youtu.be/pGaUlferotY?t=59