With Cryptocurrencies there are none, by design.
>> Bitcoin has more utility than a clone because it has a unique history and a unique set of backers (the network) and those backers have exactly the same function as they state.
This is utter nonsense, backers have none of the power of the state to alter supply, set rates etc etc.
>> Bitcoin is better supported than some currencies and worse supported than others. But it exist in that spectrum not separate from it.
Well, given the fees, processing times, lack of support mechanisms and transaction processing limits, I'd say it's a damn poor one.
There is always a reality. That same reality plays out differently with bitcoin compared to the USD but fundamentally there is no absolute base for either currency nor bitcoin. And history is littered with examples of this.
The nonsense part was you saying that the BTC community back the currency like a government. They can't, the currency doesn't work that way.
I'm surprised you don't know this.
You claimed that bitcoin's backers have the same power as the state. They do not. End of story.
So no it's not irrelevant it's the very core of this discussion.
It's an illusion to think that just because a government is behind a currency it's exempt from loosing all it's value.
The lender of last resort is the government but governments can fail.
Just because they are stable today does not make them stable tomorrow.
Bitcoin has more utility than a clone because it has a unique history and a unique set of backers (the network) and those backers have exactly the same function as they state.
Bitcoin is better supported than some currencies and worse supported than others. But it exist in that spectrum not separate from it.