News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ubuntu 11.04 is going to be named the Natty Narwhal by endtime on Tuesday August 17, 2010 @08:37PM (#1612896)
Is there any justification for that distinction? That is, does Canonical consider the x.10 builds experimental and the x.04 builds stable? I've never heard that.
Re:Ubuntu 11.04 is going to be named the Natty Narwhal by ErrantX on Tuesday August 17, 2010 @08:39PM (#1612898)
No, just my personal experience. It's not entirely true for evey release but I find it a good rule if thumb.
Re:Ubuntu 11.04 is going to be named the Natty Narwhal by andrerobot on Wednesday August 18, 2010 @01:18AM (#1613325)
IMO it's just better to stick to LTS releases, Canonical tends to make less experimental changes in those releases, because things should work for 3 years. In the other hand, on post LTS releases like 10.10 (which is a x.10 release) they have more freedom to do more under the hood changes.