Re:Bitcoin has little shot at ever being a major global curr...
by Chris2048 on Thursday January 11, 2018 @09:21AM
(#16123982)
Then you aren't comparing like-for-like. Value in bitcoin represents a disagreement with your consideration of who is "good", in the same way investment in a currency might be seen as confidence in the institutions that back it. You could just as well argue there should only be one monetary currency.
How much effort do credit-rating, fraud etc agencies make? A centralized currency requires trust, which crypto-currencies don't. To compare value, you need to add a price tag to this liability. The lower cost comes from the savings made in not having to secure against the central authority itself.
Re:Bitcoin has little shot at ever being a major global curr...
by prepend on Thursday January 11, 2018 @05:21PM
(#16128589)
But this decentralization is a feature, not a bug. It might be more efficient on the surface to centralize and just have everyone trust a mint, but that defeats the purpose of decentralization.
There are other upsides like independence.
It’s more efficient for everyone to take a bus and never drive a car alone. But cars give freedom. It’s more efficient for the world to eat soy lent instead of a diverse diet.
Complaining about how cars use more fuel than buses or how strawberries take more water and fertilizer than soy neglects to capture all the benefits gained for those higher costs.
A centralized currency lets the central source of trust protect their security at far lower cost.