The entrepreneurs on this "newsgroup" are ALL web entrepreneurs. This means that half of the criteria do not even pertain our needs/interests as founders of entrepreneurial ventures. (tech populations / graduation rates may apply but those should be looked at separately.
Let me pose this question. If VC/angel fudning / programmers needs / location was not an issue, where would you start your company?
There are a lot of places in this country that in my opinion would gather much more interest on a local level that starting a company in NY or SF. I think by starting a web company in an already "hot" web area is like opening a starbucks across the street from a starbucks? Sure you know it will get business, but it would be better if it was the 1st starbucks on a major University Campus.
By launching in a less saturated market, you have the benefit of traditional sources of media attention so that you receive high adoption rates locally, which as we know is vital to high adoption rates globally. Does company location have anything to do with adoption rates?
Thoughts?
Silicon Valley is the best place for tech startups because there are more tech success stories here than anywhere else. Success stories bring with them: - Capital injection into the economy - Happy investors prepared to take more risk in their portfolio - Inspiration to young entrepreneurs - More networks and experience
Anything else is irrelevant in my opinion.