Re:North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map
by maxerickson on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:03AM
(#16115913)
First define what goals are "fair" or "balanced".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map
by wybiral on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:04AM
(#16115933)
Proportionate representation.
Re:North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map
by RightMillennial on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:15AM
(#16116072)
Not that I disagree, but at what level do you establish proportional representation? At the state, county, city/town/municipality, somewhere in between? Currently, I think the boundaries are drawn ad-hoc but loosely defined by population, geography, and demographics that benefit who ever is in charge of the pen.
Re:North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map
by maxerickson on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:13AM
(#16116050)
Proportionate along what lines?
Voter parties?
The interest voters express preferences for by voting?
The interests voters idealize (they may vote pragmatically within existing rules)?
Etc., etc.
A purely algorithmic solution needs to encode preferences and how to balance them, so they need to be defined quite precisely.
Re:North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map
by cabalamat on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:21AM
(#16116153)
Proportionate by whatever groups the voters self-select. If there are 13 seats then any group of 1/13th of the voters that votes for the same candidate should get that cantitate election.
Re:North Carolina Is Ordered to Redraw Its Congressional Map
by maxerickson on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:23AM
(#16116175)
That's not a district plan, it's a different way of apportioning representation. Hence my confusion.