News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meltdown Proof-of-Concept by SheinhardtWigCo on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @06:08PM (#16111032)
It's odd to publicly state that they didn't know about it, because now if they don't do the same after the next big flaw comes out, the implication will be that they indeed knew and were quietly exploiting it. I thought that was why they generally don't comment on these things. The less-charitable assumption is that they'll make this claim every time regardless of whether it's true.

The claim that "the U.S. government would never put a major company like Intel in a position of risk" is obviously bullshit. TAO's job necessarily involves exposing companies both in the US and overseas to that kind of risk on a daily basis.

Re:Meltdown Proof-of-Concept by arrestedDevelpr on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @01:28AM (#16112940)
Implications? Who cares what the peanut gallery thinks?
Re:Meltdown Proof-of-Concept by dirtbox on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @07:15PM (#16111453)
It's the type of announcement that makes me wonder if they had the chip makers incorporate it specifically for them to exploit.
Re:Meltdown Proof-of-Concept by mehrdadn on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @07:56PM (#16111680)
> It's the type of announcement that makes me wonder if they had the chip makers incorporate it specifically for them to exploit.

...sorry, what?

It makes you wonder if the NSA had chip makers incorporate speculative execution and caching because... timing attacks?

Re:Meltdown Proof-of-Concept by dirtbox on Wednesday January 10, 2018 @11:45AM (#16116457)
No.

It's just that it's highly suspicious that anyone is making any type of mention of it at all.