News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A letter about Google AMP by seandougall on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @03:36PM (#16109780)
The First Amendment gives them the legal right to curate results as they wish without interference by the U.S. government. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that other people aren't allowed to get pissed off.

I don't think the letter authors were calling for an Act of Congress. My read is that they were calling attention to the damage that AMP does to the content providers. And perhaps they could have put more emphasis on the fact that it's in Google's long-term interest not to bleed content providers dry.

Re:A letter about Google AMP by dontnotice on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @04:14PM (#16110142)
They seem to suggest that Google's control over their own site's design/function is somehow an affront to their cause, not mention malicious.

They certainly see it as a big enough grievance to include in a manifesto type document which repugnantly entitled.

Re:A letter about Google AMP by angus-prune on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @06:44PM (#16111239)
Free speech cuts both ways.

You seem to suggestthat OP's control over their own site content (ie the manifesto) is somehow an affront to your belief in google's free speech.

You certainly see it as a big enough grievance to write a comment on HN which is repugnantly entitled.

They get to pass comment on google's behaviour (a comment which, incidentaly, a lot of people seem to agree with). You get to pass comment on their behaviour. I get to pass comment on your behaviour.

Holding people and companies to account in a soft manner, without resorting to force (legislation counts as force) is an important aspect of a functioning free society. The freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism but freedom to criticise.