News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by gthtjtkt on Monday January 08, 2018 @03:23PM (#16100095)
> I am terrified about giving smartphones to my kids.

I am terrified by the fact that so many other people don't think twice about handing their toddler a smart device. Every time we go to dinner, there's a table nearby with a tablet planted in front of a child in a booster seat.

"There's no evidence that it's harmful", people say, but how could the evidence possibly exist? It would take 16+ years to do a thorough study (possibly longer), but smartphones have only been popular for half that time. And people have only been using them as babysitters for the past 3-5 years, at most.

We may not know the true extent of their damage until it's far too late for the affected generation. There's always a chance that the damage will be minor and/or reversible, but most people don't seem to grasp the risk they're taking.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by duderific on Monday January 08, 2018 @07:01PM (#16102184)
> Every time we go to dinner, there's a table nearby with a tablet planted in front of a child in a booster seat.

I'm guessing you're not a parent. As the parent of a 3-year-old boy, I'd like to weigh in on this. There are three kinds of parents out there:

1) Those that simply hand their kid a phone/tablet every time they're out and about. This is probably bad.

2) Those that never let their kid use a device at a restaurant. This is pretty rare.

3) Those that use the device in times of true need: their kid has been at the dinner table for a long time and needs some distraction so the parents can get through their meal. This is where I fall, and I think it's ok. Most three year olds are not built to sit quietly and eat a meal at a restaurant. I guess maybe back in the day, people would simply leave their kid with a sitter and go out to eat, but that's not always an option.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by RepressedEmu on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @02:58PM (#16109363)
All the 1's probably think they're 3's, though.
Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by somtum on Tuesday January 09, 2018 @06:09AM (#16105200)
> 3) Those that use the device in times of true need: their kid has been at the dinner table for a long time and needs some distraction so the parents can get through their meal.

Sounds like us. Either that or my wife and I would take turns carrying our kid around while the other finishes off their meal.

Re:The growing body of evidence that digital distraction is ... by lr4444lr on Monday January 08, 2018 @04:20PM (#16100703)
If you need to come armed with facts:

https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages...

Scroll down to "Among the AAP recommendations" for the tl;dr.