The reality is: we don't have a complete answer as to why there is unequal representation of women in tech. Period. We can explore this issue, and in the mean time, let's not make unsupportable claims and assumptions about humans, Ok?

Sounds good! So let's just hire the best candidate regardless of race or sex. Problem solved.

And what happens if you don't?

Apparently I'll only accept objective scientific claims to the contrary. We're turning over a new leaf here.

I am okay with not making unsupportable claims and assumptions about humans but that isn't what is happening in tech. The reason given to explain the gender gap is sexism. Which is pretty close to unsupportable...

No. Neither side must make claims about what is not understood (which is nearly everything). Damore is the one making the claim, and one with very serious consequences.

Would it be fair then to describe Google's hiring policy as preferring the best candidate regardless of race / sex?

No, because "best" is highly unscientific and subjective, and can change in an uncountable number of ways depending on environment.

Ok, then what's your objective and scientific way of hiring?

There isn't one. That's the point. So don't make claims about it.