News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Struggling Artist at 86 by yesenadam on Sunday January 07, 2018 @08:43PM (#16094048)
This seems close to assuming that financial value is ultimately the only value of art.

That couldn't be further from the truth.

Re:The Struggling Artist at 86 by WalterBright on Sunday January 07, 2018 @10:17PM (#16094396)
Ultimately it is. If nobody is willing to pay $10 for something, then its value is less than $10.
Re:The Struggling Artist at 86 by yesenadam on Monday January 08, 2018 @03:22AM (#16095399)
You don't seem to have heard of any value except monetary. (OK, maybe that's not fair/likely, but you sure talk like it.) I guess it's (just?) a confusion in the word 'value'.

The way you are talking of the value of art in money terms is.. well... People who love art don't talk like that. Do you speak of love, life, health etc in similar terms?

Oh anyway. It's pretty amazing to me to hear such views in person. I mean, scary, horrific, chilling. It only happened to me once in my life before this thread.

I think...you have been brainwashed to think that all value is (or can be put) in terms of money. Is it possible to be happy while thinking like that? ..There are a thousand things I could say to that, not sure where to start. (Unfortunately I've learnt quickly in my brief time here that discussion on HN with those of different views is very counterproductive. It has been so far anyway.)

Re:The Struggling Artist at 86 by exolymph on Monday January 08, 2018 @01:27AM (#16095026)
There are multiple definitions of "value" and not all are financial.