This is a feature of basically every modern CSPRNG and a basic consequence of the crypto primitives we use to design CSPRNGs.
That's good to hear. It seems intuitive that it should be impractical to usefully influence randomness; if I can predict anything after a whitening step, isn't that whitening step horribly broken? But I've learned to squelch my intuition when it comes to cryptography.
(Now would be a great time to plug Matasano...)
Well, several years ago would be a good time to plug Matasano, since it doesn't exist anymore. :)
I don't know the first thing about cryptanalysis, but what I gather from skimming the PDF is that yes, it's possible to advantageously influence a PRNG with bad inputs if the mixer sucks.