News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Issues Updates to Protect Systems from Security Exp... by pishpash on Thursday January 04, 2018 @04:21PM (#16074198)
Did Intel promise in their docs that side channel attacks are not possible? If not, then OS writers are equally to blame for making incorrect assumptions. I don't think this is Intel's fault alone.

On a grander note, there are probably hundreds of even more esoteric side channel attacks all across the system since every process changes the system state. This is more like the beginning of a new style of attacks now that one is shown to be practical, rather than any particular entity's fault. Hardware designers will need to consider informational and physical isolation in a more rigorous way, and there may be theoretical limits that bound the performance-security tradeoff when you share resources.

Re:Intel Issues Updates to Protect Systems from Security Exp... by mike_hearn on Friday January 05, 2018 @06:29AM (#16077978)
They do not. And more problematically for the "It's all Intel's fault" story, in the SGX documentation they explicitly state that their chips do not protect against side channel attacks and that it's up to the software developer to handle it. As SGX is a part of the CPU effectively that means their official chip docs rule out side channel protection as a feature.

I don't know if playing the blame game here is going to be productive. All CPUs are vulnerable to side channel attacks of various kinds and focusing on Meltdown specifically seems like missing the forest for the trees - especially as ARM has the same issue in some of their designs.